|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
© 2004 by Rick Altman. All Rights Reserved.
WE HAVE SEEN IT countless times before, but this latest one was particularly poignant. The intelligent presenter, with something important to say, who got lost in her slides. She started out beautifully, introducing herself and her ideas, standing before a well-designed title slide. She knew what she wanted to say and she said it—a surprisingly complete strategy for delivering a good presentation.
She should have stuck to that strategy, because as soon as her first bullet slide appeared, things began to go south. She found herself no longer saying what she wanted to say; she was saying what the slide wanted her to say. Soon, it was as if she was speaking to the slide, and soon after that, it was clear to everyone in the room: She had lost her connection with the audience.
During her introduction, she was not paying attention to the screen behind her, concentrating only on her ideas and the people listening to them. But as the bullet slides appeared, her priorities shifted. She stopped paying attention to the audience. She became a drone. She stopped connecting with her audience, and instead only connected with her slides. That, dear readers, is a recipe for failure.
This lesson can be learned by all of the people involved in a presentation—those who build them and those who deliver them. Content creation and delivery cannot really be separated: How you prepare your content has a profound impact on how it is delivered, and thinking first about how you want to deliver your talk influences your preparation.
In an ideal circumstance, you create a triangle of interdependence between yourself, your audience, and your slides. Without your slides, your ideas are not as effective; without you, your slides lack context; and without your audience, well, your presentation is pointless. The sides of this triangle are not equal: you will be forgiven for paying more attention to your audience than your slides, but you deserve no such forgiveness if you do the opposite.
And again, these are not wholly presentation issues—you need to address them when you build your content. Let’s look at two of the classic errors that PowerPoint presenters make:
Obnoxious animations: This one is obvious, and alarmingly easy to fix during content creation: Remove all local animation from your bullets, head to the master slide, and apply a fade or a wipe.
There is no action that would be more crucial to audience rapport than this. Think about it, you want your audience to have the sense that you know what you are talking about and that you know what is important and what is not. You could argue that the most important first impression to make is that you understand what is important and relevant and what is not. So what does it say about you if your bullets feature frivolous animation? It says that you can’t identify what is truly important about an idea. And if you give that impression, thank your hosts and leave now—you’re done.
In the history of PowerPoint, nobody has ever been offended by bullets that wipe or fade, at medium speed or faster. You cannot go wrong with them.
Reciting your slides: If bad animation is the most inhibitive to connecting with your audience, this one is a close second. This creates any or all of the following impressions: 1) You did not prepare; 2) You are incapable of communicating an original thought; and 3) You have doubts that your audience members are smart enough to be able to read the slide on their own.
These are not exactly the things you meant to convey when you found yourself reciting each bullet, word for word, in front of a room full of people. But the problem is that it’s quite hard to avoid it. When something appears on screen, it’s all-too-easy to treat it like a script. Your mission as you prepare your bullet points is to make it practically impossible to do that.
Let’s say that you are creating a presentation on this very topic of lecturing with bullet points. Here are the points you want to make:
Bullets are at their best when they…
If you display this verbose slide and then read it aloud, you do
nothing to engender confidence with your audience. And you will
sound like a drone. So instead, create bullets that do not compel
you to commit droneage. What if you displayed this instead:
The three reasons to use bullets:
These bullets are imaginative, effectively vague, and coy. Moreover,
they will not compel you to recite them word for word, although
if you did, it wouldn’t be as bad as with the verbose slide,
because you would obviously elaborate about each point. With the
coy bullets, you have no choice but to turn to the audience and
state your case.
And when you’re done stating your case, then you can replace the coy slide with the verbose one (using a nice fade, of course!), so that you give them the visual of your idea. In fact, how bad would it be if, before displaying the verbose slide, you recited it word for word? Not too bad, actually—reciting bullets before they appear is not nearly as bad as doing it afterward. You tell your audience that you have given thought to an effective way to present the idea, you don’t drone, and you don’t risk insult to their intelligence.
Everyone knows that it is not wise to recite bullets aloud, but not as many realize that it’s hard not to. It’s worth the extra effort to create bullets that don’t turn you into a drone.
One of the decisions that presentation builders regularly face is whether to display their elements one at a time or all at once. No article can evaluate for you the various constraints and factors of preparing a presentation, but in general, a presenter’s life is made much easier by slides whose elements appear automatically as opposed to each by its own mouse click.
Three potentially hazardous things arise when you set your elements to appear On Click instead of After Previous:
1. You do not provide context for the bullets, showing your audience only the trees, not the forest.
2. You risk losing the context yourself. You might have to refer to your notes in a situation where you otherwise wouldn’t have to.
3. You might forget which element is the last one on the slide and advance to the next one, thinking that there was one more element left. Not disastrous, but not exactly polished, either.
The other problem with staging bullets and other elements one by one is that it is very tempting to employ the Dim on Next Click command. Let’s make this really simple: DON’T DO THAT!
Ninety-five out of 100 times that the Dim option is used, it is used because the creator thought that it would be cool or because he just learned about it. It is quite rare to see it used when there is a good reason for it. But here’s a good reason not to: it is one more time when you could insult your audience.
Dimming bullets as you go could imply to your audience members that you don’t trust them to keep pace with the material or to be able to follow the logic in your thread. Do they have Attention Deficit Disorder? Are they not capable of following your ideas without your resorting to grade-school measures? Is it not a bit like the little ball that bounces above the words on Sesame Street? How would your audience members react if they were to feel as if you were treating them like Sesame Street viewers?
Bullets don’t warrant this type of complication. Just throw them out there and then talk about them. Life is too short to fret about how you display them, and when you realize that fact, you communicate it. When you communicate it, you tell your audience that (here we go again) you know what is important and what is not. That’s a good thing.
If you find yourself in a situation where you truly need to stage elements on click, do yourself a favor and stash an inconspicuous object at the end of the animation order. Make it a thin rule along the bottom or side of the slide, or maybe one right below the title. Set it to Appear automatically after the last element. Nobody will notice it (and if they do, big deal), but it tells you when you’re done with the elements, so you can proceed to the next slide gracefully instead of accidentally. Here is an example
What’s the most valuable key on a presenter’s keyboard? The one that blanks the screen. Pressing B turns a screen black (usually the better choice) and W turns it white. It is the simplest way to direct an audience’s attention away from an obsolete slide and toward you.
If your thoughts and ideas have outpaced the content of the current slide, you risk a disconnect with your audience if you leave that slide up too long. The best practice is to design a blank slide, with just the background and maybe your branding logo sunk into the background with soft contrast. During content preparation, try to anticipate the points in your talk where you want the audience to look only at you, not the screen. Those would be the times to insert one of these blanks.
We know that it’s not always possible to predict that. General Q&A time is obvious; other situations are not so obvious. And for those times, remember the B key, which will toggle the screen both on and off. Many of the wireless remote slide advancers offer a screen blanking button; we now consider that a requirement for a remote.
And by the way, those remotes help you connect with your audience, too, simply by untethering you to the computer. If your slides include hyperlinks and other objects that you need to click, you should look at the remotes that offer cursor movement and mouse clicks.
Addressing these issues as you build your slides will help you build better slides, which in turn, will turn you or a co-worker into a better presenter. You will build slides that help you strengthen the most important side of the triangle, the one between you and your audience.
To discuss this article or PowerPoint in general, please head to our Forum.
Copyright 2004, All rights reserved. Have an opinion? Share it with the Corel community at the CorelWORLD Forum. There is already quite a bit of discussion about this story. Join in.
May 2007: As simple as possible, but not simpler... · April 2007: Killer Keystrokes · March 2007: Resolution Confusion · January 2007: Fearless Forecasts for 2007 · November 2006: Epiphanies at PowerPoint Live 2006 · August 2006: Escaping Death by PowerPoint · July 2006: Notes from the Floor of InfoComm · June 2006: Beyond PowerPoint--Making Movies for Business and Pleasure, Part II · May 2006: Beyond PowerPoint--From Photos to DVDs · April 2006: It’s Your Music!--Overcoming the oppressive restrictions of iTunes · March 2006: CorelDraw X3—A few must-haves and a few missed opportunities, all in all, a credible upgrade · February 2006: Making Windows Inhabitable · January 2006: Fearless Forecasts for 2006 · September 2005: Just What is a Background Anyway? · August 2005: Meet David Dobson, Corel's New CEO · July 2005: Community, Blind Dates. and Albert Einstein: An Interview with the PowerPoint Live Conference Host · June 2005: CorelWorld 2005: Image Editors, Executive Appearances, and Krispy Kremes · May 2005: As Adobe's Shadow Grows, Is Corel Better off or Worse? · March 2005: Delivering Your Presentation: How Close to the Source Can You Get? · February 2005: Digital Photography: The Killer App of this Generation Part II · January 2005: Digital Photography: The Killer App of this Generation · November 2004: A Killer Deal for Corel Or Another Distraction? · September 2004: The Scourge that is Kazaa and AOL Instant Messenger · August 2004: The Golden Triangle: Presenter, Audience, and Slides · July 2004: A Blast from the Past: How Fast is Fast Enough? · June 2004: Guilty Pleasures · May 2004: A Personal Wish List for PowerPoint 12 · April 2004: Eyedropping: Version 12 makes a good tool even better... · March 2004: Deadly Sins Of Modern PowerPoint Usage · February 2004: Is the even-numbered curse finally over? · January 2004: Another take on Achieving Absence of Ugliness · November 2003: What can we do it again??--Debut of PowerPoint Live Leaves Unquenchable Thirst with the Host · September 2003: Corel Corp. Has a New Custodian · July 2003: Candor and Contrition at CorelWORLD · June 2003: What a Long, Great Trip It’s Been! · May 2003: The Boat that Corel is Missing · April 2003: No Fooling...Is Corel Breaking Up? · March 2003: The Annual Design-a-Brochure Contest · February 2003: Symbolism is Everything · January 2003: Mania, Our Semi-Annual Pilgrimage to Holland · October 2002: On Creativity, Problem-Solving, and Paper Bags · July 2002: CorelDRAW 11: Surprise, Surprise... · May 2002: The Sound of Silence: What does it mean when a company plays its cards so close to its chest? · April 2002: The Art and Science of Presentation Graphics--Creating for the Screen Has its own Challenges · March 2002: CorelDRAW 11: What kind of personality and attitude should a software program have today? · February 2002: Oy, my aching fingers... · December 2001: Digital Photography · November 2001: Can we say goodbye to the Rolls Royce Mentality? · October 2001: An Unforgettable Week: The drama that unfolded around CorelWORLD · August-September 2001: The Art of Paragraphics: New-age ingredients for success with Corel VENTURA · July 2001: Your Very Own Interface: How to make Corel applications read your mind · June 2001: Fighting the Font Wars: How to stay sane with your sans · May 2001--Turning the Key at Nicholas-Applegate · April 2001--A Modest Proposal for Reviving VENTURA Publisher
Copyright © 1995–2013 Unleashed Productions, Inc., All Rights Reserved.
