|
|
|
|
||||
© 2004 by Rick Altman. All Rights Reserved.
| An error occurred. Please try later.An error occurred. Please try later. |
A sure sign that a company is operating in the black is when it begins to look beyond its own borders. If nothing else, Corel’s recent acquisition of the Minnesota-based Jasc is a clear indication of Corel’s return to profitability. Beyond that, nothing is quite that clear, and the implications of this move might not be fully realized for years. But watching from the sidelines, we see plenty to like about this transaction...and yes, some risks, as well.
As a private company, Corel is no longer required to report quarterly earnings, and as Jasc was also privately-held, we do not know how much Corel paid to buy the company. But it is common knowledge that Corel has enjoyed four consecutive profitable quarters (for the first time since the heady Linux days of 1999) and we also know that Jasc was not exactly hurting, either, with its low-overhead online distribution channels and its deep penetration of over 30 million registered users worldwide.
In a way, Jasc reminds us of a young Corel: a lean organization that is incredibly focused on the few products that it knows that it can develop really well. When Corel made its mark in the early 1990s, it did so as a company of 40. They were all about CorelDraw and they reached the pinnacle of the PC graphics market with laser-focused goals on developing and marketing it. It was when Corel began to extend its reach that it began to struggle. Moving into the Macintosh market, misguided forays into hardware, and then the WordPerfect aquisition which, literally overnight, turned Microsoft from an ally into a foe.
Jasc avoided such pitfalls. Paint Shop Pro earned acclaim as a $25 download and the Studio version can still be purchased online for just $69. Paint Shop Pro never tried to penetrate the Mac market and it never was transmogrified into some large suite costing several hundred dollars. Paint Shop Pro has earned a reputation as a solid performer in the image-editing space, and more important, has made deep inroads into the retail distribution channels in a way that Corel has not.
Together, Corel and Jasc are a formidable team, well suited to ride the tsunami that is digital photography. Corel president Amish Mehta hints at how product positioning will stack up, at least in the short term: “The Paint Shop family of graphics and imaging software gives us a strong entry level product line. Over the long term, we believe Corel will capture millions of new customers and greatly expand our footprint with consumers who regularly purchase digital photography software.”
It’s not at all obvious that Paint Shop Pro deserves the subordinate role of entry-level behind Corel’s PhotoPaint, but that is nothing more than a pleasant problem for Corel to have. The fact is that both programs enjoy a high degree of user loyalty among those who feel disenfranchised, alienated, or simply not connected with Adobe and Photoshop. Despite Photoshop’s dominance, those translate to significant numbers — tens of millions of users.
The two organizations also share a common perspective on how to live in Adobe’s shadow: they both believe there is prosperity to be enjoyed in the shade. Jasc has always taken that approach, and once the new leadership stopped the company from chasing those windmills, Corel too has seen the business graphics marketplace as its best destiny.
This like-mindedness is imporant, at least in the short-term, as Corel has made it clear that it intends to keep the entire Paint Shop Pro development team intact as a distinct working entity. They will remain in Eden Prairie MN and will remain focused on the well-defined set of programs that got them to this bigger dance floor.
But the long term is not nearly so clean. Paint Shop Pro can piggyback on Corel’s greater resources, and Corel can take advantage of Jasc’s retail penetration, but at some point, brand identity could become a hindrance, not an asset. And when that happens, the elephant that is already sitting in the living room will need to be regarded: Will Corel roll Paint Shop into PhotoPaint to create a single product? And if it does, how will Paint Shop users respond?
To be sure, this would not produce the anti-christ-like emotion that would result if it were Adobe devouring the program. But the PSP user community has a high-degree of loyalty and enough us-vs.-them mentality to provoke the kind of emotion that was displayed almost immediately on newsgroups:
I don't view this purchase of Jasc as good news at all. If the Corel culture takes over, we can look forward to non-existent support, patches that don't fix bugs, and costly major releases that don't resolve long-standing issues.
I would expect Corel to take good coders away from core Jasc work, and eliminate most of the support personnel to maximize profit. The core product we are accustomed to purchasing alone might be swept into a "suite" so you can no longer buy it for less than $100. The upgrade price will go up, for no additional value.
Time will tell, indeed, but I'm not optimistic.
Corel finds itself in an unusual position — that of the evil empire swallowing up pawns. In truth, Corel and Jasc are more alike than they are disparate. “Technically, Corel is a larger company, but not much larger,” says Kris Zaklika, a visible member of the Jasc product marketing team. “The Corel people are very much like the Jasc people, right down to the winter weather both have to live through at their respective locations.”
There are several components about the purchase that invite optimism:
Unlike the WordPerfect purchase, unlike the dreadful hardware acquisitions
of a decade ago, unlike the unceremonious Micrografx bailout, unlike
the Linux distraction, and even unlike buying Painter, Paint Shop
Pro fits hand in glove with CorelDraw. The two could form an unusually
strong combination that could resonate loudly throughout the business
graphics marketplace.
Corel needs to bring good identity and focus to its marketing efforts and it must avoid confusion about its three programs with “paint” in their names. If it can achieve that, this purchase could be a big win for a company that has fought hard to put itself into a position to enjoy a few victories.
To discuss this article or PowerPoint in general, please head to our Forum.
Copyright 2004, All rights reserved. Have an opinion? Share it with the Corel community at the CorelWORLD Forum. There is already quite a bit of discussion about this story. Join in.
May 2007: As simple as possible, but not simpler... · April 2007: Killer Keystrokes · March 2007: Resolution Confusion · January 2007: Fearless Forecasts for 2007 · November 2006: Epiphanies at PowerPoint Live 2006 · August 2006: Escaping Death by PowerPoint · July 2006: Notes from the Floor of InfoComm · June 2006: Beyond PowerPoint--Making Movies for Business and Pleasure, Part II · May 2006: Beyond PowerPoint--From Photos to DVDs · April 2006: It’s Your Music!--Overcoming the oppressive restrictions of iTunes · March 2006: CorelDraw X3—A few must-haves and a few missed opportunities, all in all, a credible upgrade · February 2006: Making Windows Inhabitable · January 2006: Fearless Forecasts for 2006 · September 2005: Just What is a Background Anyway? · August 2005: Meet David Dobson, Corel's New CEO · July 2005: Community, Blind Dates. and Albert Einstein: An Interview with the PowerPoint Live Conference Host · June 2005: CorelWorld 2005: Image Editors, Executive Appearances, and Krispy Kremes · May 2005: As Adobe's Shadow Grows, Is Corel Better off or Worse? · March 2005: Delivering Your Presentation: How Close to the Source Can You Get? · February 2005: Digital Photography: The Killer App of this Generation Part II · January 2005: Digital Photography: The Killer App of this Generation · November 2004: A Killer Deal for Corel Or Another Distraction? · September 2004: The Scourge that is Kazaa and AOL Instant Messenger · August 2004: The Golden Triangle: Presenter, Audience, and Slides · July 2004: A Blast from the Past: How Fast is Fast Enough? · June 2004: Guilty Pleasures · May 2004: A Personal Wish List for PowerPoint 12 · April 2004: Eyedropping: Version 12 makes a good tool even better... · March 2004: Deadly Sins Of Modern PowerPoint Usage · February 2004: Is the even-numbered curse finally over? · January 2004: Another take on Achieving Absence of Ugliness · November 2003: What can we do it again??--Debut of PowerPoint Live Leaves Unquenchable Thirst with the Host · September 2003: Corel Corp. Has a New Custodian · July 2003: Candor and Contrition at CorelWORLD · June 2003: What a Long, Great Trip It’s Been! · May 2003: The Boat that Corel is Missing · April 2003: No Fooling...Is Corel Breaking Up? · March 2003: The Annual Design-a-Brochure Contest · February 2003: Symbolism is Everything · January 2003: Mania, Our Semi-Annual Pilgrimage to Holland · October 2002: On Creativity, Problem-Solving, and Paper Bags · July 2002: CorelDRAW 11: Surprise, Surprise... · May 2002: The Sound of Silence: What does it mean when a company plays its cards so close to its chest? · April 2002: The Art and Science of Presentation Graphics--Creating for the Screen Has its own Challenges · March 2002: CorelDRAW 11: What kind of personality and attitude should a software program have today? · February 2002: Oy, my aching fingers... · December 2001: Digital Photography · November 2001: Can we say goodbye to the Rolls Royce Mentality? · October 2001: An Unforgettable Week: The drama that unfolded around CorelWORLD · August-September 2001: The Art of Paragraphics: New-age ingredients for success with Corel VENTURA · July 2001: Your Very Own Interface: How to make Corel applications read your mind · June 2001: Fighting the Font Wars: How to stay sane with your sans · May 2001--Turning the Key at Nicholas-Applegate · April 2001--A Modest Proposal for Reviving VENTURA Publisher
Copyright © 1995–2013 Unleashed Productions, Inc., All Rights Reserved.
